
December 12, 2025 • 23 min read

December 12, 2025 • 23 min read
"In advertising, knowing what your competitors are doing isn't espionage, it's essential market research. The only question is: are you just looking at history, or are you building your future?"
- Vibemyad
Ad libraries and ad archives are often used interchangeably, but they serve different purposes. An ad archive is typically a historical repository (like Meta's Ad Library or Google's Transparency Center) that stores ads for transparency and compliance purposes. An ad library, on the other hand, is a comprehensive intelligence platform that not only archives ads but also provides analysis, filtering, creative inspiration, and competitive insights.
Key Differences:
• Ad Archives = Historical record + transparency focus
• Ad Libraries = Creative intelligence + competitive analysis + actionable insights
Bottom Line: If you just need to verify what ads a brand ran, an archive works. If you want to understand WHY ads work, track competitor strategies, and create better campaigns, you need an ad library platform.
Let's start with a scenario: You're scrolling through Instagram and see a competitor's ad that's absolutely crushing it. You think, "I need to see what else they're running." Where do you go?
Most marketers immediately think "ad library," but what they're actually looking for might be housed in an "ad archive." The confusion is real, and it's costing marketers valuable time and money.
Here's the thing: these terms are often used interchangeably in the marketing world, but they represent fundamentally different tools with different purposes, features, and value propositions. Understanding this difference isn't just semantic hair-splitting; it's about choosing the right tool for your actual needs.
According to a 2024 study by Social Media Today, 78% of marketers use competitive ad intelligence tools, but only 34% understand the difference between basic ad archives and comprehensive ad library platforms. This knowledge gap leads to two problems:
Marketers overpay for features they don't need
Marketers underbuy and miss critical intelligence capabilities
Let me break down what these terms actually mean, why the distinction matters, and which one you really need for your marketing goals.
By the end of this post, you'll understand:
• The precise definitions of ad archives vs. ad libraries
• Core functionality differences between the two
• When to use free archives vs. paid library platforms
• How to evaluate which solution fits your needs
• Real pricing and feature comparisons across major platforms
• Actionable next steps based on your marketing goals
Whether you're a solo designer hunting for creative inspiration, a marketing manager analyzing competitor strategies, or an agency juggling multiple client campaigns, this guide will help you make the right choice.
Think of it this way: an ad archive is like a public library's card catalogue system. It tells you what books exist, when they were published, and where to find them. An ad library platform is like having a research assistant who not only finds the books but also summarizes them, identifies patterns across multiple books, tells you which ones are most popular, and suggests which ones you should read based on your specific goals.
The fundamental distinction:
Ad Archive = A database or repository that stores advertising data, primarily for transparency, compliance, and historical record-keeping. These are typically free, platform-provided tools like Meta's Ad Library or Google's Ads Transparency Center.
Ad Library Platform = A comprehensive intelligence tool that collects, organizes, analyzes, and presents advertising data with advanced features like filtering, trend analysis, creative insights, and competitive intelligence. These are typically paid third-party platforms like Vibemyad, AdSpy, or BigSpy.
According to HubSpot's 2024 Marketing Report, marketers using comprehensive ad library platforms report 2.3x higher campaign ROI compared to those relying solely on free ad archives. The reason? Intelligence beats information every time.
Ad archives are official repositories maintained by advertising platforms (like Meta, Google, LinkedIn) to provide transparency around political advertising, social issue ads, and increasingly, all commercial advertising.
Primary characteristics of ad archives:
Free and publicly accessible - No subscription required
Platform-specific - Each platform (Meta, Google, TikTok) has its own archive
Transparency-focused - Originally created to combat misinformation
Basic search functionality - Limited filtering and sorting options
Historical records - Shows when ads ran, how much was spent (sometimes), targeting info (limited)
Meta Ad Library (formerly Facebook Ad Library)
• URL: https://www.facebook.com/ads/library
• Covers: Facebook, Instagram, Messenger, Audience Network
• Features: Basic keyword search, date filters, country selection
• Data shown: Ad creative, start date, platforms, disclaimer (for certain ads)
• Limitation: Clunky interface, limited filtering, no performance metrics
Google Ads Transparency Center
• URL: https://adstransparency.google.com/
• Covers: Google Search, YouTube, Display Network
• Features: Advertiser verification, format filters, date ranges
• Data shown: Ad creatives, formats, verification status
• Limitation: Less comprehensive than Meta, no engagement data
TikTok Ad Library
• URL: https://library.tiktok.com/
• Covers: TikTok platform ads
• Features: Region selection, industry filters, hashtag search
• Data shown: Video ads, industry category, region
• Limitation: Limited historical data, basic search only
LinkedIn Ad Library
• Currently limited transparency tools
• Available through LinkedIn Campaign Manager for advertisers only
• No comprehensive public archive yet
Let's be clear about limitations:
❌ Not strategic intelligence tools - They show you WHAT ran, not WHY it worked
❌ Not creative databases - Finding specific ad types or styles is tedious
❌ Not performance trackers - No engagement metrics, conversion data, or success indicators
❌ Not comparison tools - Can't easily compare competitors side-by-side
❌ Not organized by creative elements - Can't filter by colour, emotion, or design style
❌ Not integrated with creation tools - No way to use insights to create your own ads
According to Search Engine Journal, 89% of marketers find native ad archives "somewhat difficult" or "very difficult" to use for competitive research purposes.
Despite limitations, ad archives are ideal for:
✅ Quick competitor spot-checks - "What's Brand X running right now?"
✅ Political ad transparency - Legally required disclosure information
✅ Verifying ad spend (when available) - Budget benchmarking
✅ Free research - When the budget is zero
✅ Basic brand monitoring - Keeping tabs on a few key competitors
✅ Legal compliance checks - Ensuring regulatory adherence
If you're asking yourself, "What is the difference between ad archives and more sophisticated tools?" you're probably outgrowing the archives.
Now let's talk about what makes ad library platforms fundamentally different from basic archives.
Think about the benefits of using an ad library for small businesses; it goes way beyond just seeing what competitors are running.
Ad library platforms are third-party intelligence tools that aggregate advertising data from multiple sources and add layers of analysis, organization, and creative intelligence on top.
Core capabilities of ad libraries:
Multi-platform aggregation - One tool shows ads from Meta, Google, TikTok, LinkedIn, and native ads
Advanced filtering - Search by emotion, colour, copy length, CTA type, industry, and objective
Performance indicators - Engagement proxies, run duration, creative lifespan
Creative categorization - Organized by content type, customer journey stage, ad intent
Competitive analysis - Side-by-side brand comparisons, market share insights
Trend identification - What's working now in your industry
Creation integration - Many include AI tools to create ads based on insights
Save and organize - Build swipe files, mood boards, campaign briefs
According to AdEspresso's 2024 research, brands using ad library platforms save an average of 12.5 hours per week on competitive research compared to using free archives.
Here's what separates ad libraries from archives: the intelligence layer.
Content Bucket Categorization
• Automatically classifies ads by type (testimonial, product demo, UGC, educational)
• Identifies creative patterns that drive performance
• Shows what content types each competitor prioritizes
Customer Journey Analysis
• Maps ads to awareness, consideration, or conversion stages
• Reveals competitor funnel strategies
• Helps you identify gaps in your own journey
Ad Intent Detection
• Determines if ads aim for clicks, installs, engagement, or purchases
• Understands campaign objectives without guessing
• Aligns creative inspiration with your actual goals
Promoted Products Tracking
• Identifies which products/services get the most ad investment
• Tracks seasonal promotion patterns
• Reveals product launch strategies
Discount Identification
• Automatically detects promotional pricing, offers, and deals
• Tracks competitor pricing strategies over time
• Helps you position your own promotions competitively
These features exist in platforms like Vibemyad but are completely absent from free ad archives. As explained in our complete guide to ad intelligence platforms, this analytical depth is what transforms raw ad data into actionable strategy.
The ad library category has evolved dramatically in the past 2-3 years. According to G2's Advertising Intelligence Software category report, the market has grown 340% since 2021, with new platforms offering increasingly sophisticated features.
What modern platforms like Vibemyad offer:
🎨 AI-Powered Ad Creation - Generate designs based on competitive intelligence in under 60 seconds
📊 Deep Analytics - Understand not just what's running, but why it works
🔍 Beautiful UX - Actually enjoyable to use (a rarity in this space)
💰 Affordable Pricing - Starting at ₹999/month vs. competitors at $200-500/month
⚡ Speed - Find inspiration and create ads in minutes, not hours
🎯 Targeted Intelligence - Filter by precise criteria relevant to YOUR business
The transformation from "ad archive" thinking to "ad library" thinking is about moving from reactive research ("What are they doing?") to proactive strategy ("What should I do based on market intelligence?").
Let's get specific. Here's a detailed breakdown of what you get with each type of tool.
Let's look at specific scenarios that illustrate the difference:
Scenario 1: Finding E-commerce Ads with "Shop Now" CTAs
Using Meta Ad Library:
• Search brand name
• Manually scroll through 50+ ads
• Screenshot each relevant one
• No way to filter by CTA type
• Time required: 30-45 minutes per brand
Using an Ad Library Platform:
• Set filter: CTA = "Shop Now"
• Filter by industry = E-commerce
• Filter by date range = Last 30 days
• Bulk save to collection
• Time required: 2-3 minutes
Scenario 2: Analyzing a Competitor's Q4 Strategy
Using Free Archives:
• Visit each platform separately (Meta, Google, TikTok)
• Manually note down ads from Oct-Dec
• Try to categorize by product/service
• Create a spreadsheet to track themes
• No insight into performance
• Time required: 3-4 hours
Using Ad Library Platform:
• Select competitor
• Set date range: Q4 2024
• View automated breakdown by product category
• See performance indicators (which ads ran longest)
• Export report with insights
• Time required: 15-20 minutes
The time savings alone justify the investment for most marketing teams. According to MarketingProfs' research, the average marketer spends 6.5 hours per week on competitive research. Ad library platforms can reduce this to under 2 hours.
Now that you understand what is the difference between ad libraries and ad archives in terms of features, let's discuss when to use each type of tool.
Ad archives are perfectly adequate if you:
✅ Need occasional spot-checks - "What's Nike running right now?"
✅ Have zero budget - Literally $0 for competitive intelligence
✅ Research 1-2 competitors max - Not conducting broad market research
✅ Don't need organization - Screenshots work fine for your workflow
✅ Focus on political/transparency ads - The original purpose of these tools
✅ Work on very occasional campaigns - Marketing isn't your primary function
✅ Just need proof an ad ran - For legal or verification purposes
Example use case: You're a freelance designer who occasionally needs to verify what a brand has done previously. You check the Meta Ad Library once a month, screenshot 2-3 ads for mood board inspiration, and move on. Archives work fine for you.
You've outgrown free archives if you:
✅ Research competitors regularly - Weekly or daily competitive monitoring
✅ Manage multiple campaigns - Need organized creative inspiration
✅ Work with clients - Need professional presentations and reports
✅ Create ads frequently - Would benefit from integrated creation tools
✅ Analyze market trends - Want to see what's working in your industry
✅ Track performance indicators - Need to see which ads succeed
✅ Value time efficiency - 15 minutes vs. 2 hours matters to you
✅ Need multi-platform insights - Must see Meta + Google + TikTok data together
✅ Build strategic campaigns - Data-driven decision making is important
✅ Work in a competitive industry - Can't afford to miss market movements
Example use case: You're a marketing manager at a D2C brand. You track 8 direct competitors, monitor seasonal trends, brief your creative team weekly, and launch 6-8 campaigns per quarter. You need Vibemyad or a similar platform; archives won't cut it.
E-commerce Brands
• Need: Ad library platform
• Why: Fast-moving trends, heavy competition, need performance indicators to optimize ad spend
• Recommendation: Platform with product tracking and discount identification
B2B Companies
• Might work with: Ad archives for occasional research
• Better with: Ad library if running consistent campaigns
• Why: Longer sales cycles mean less frequent research needs, but when you do research, depth matters
Agencies
• Definitely need: Ad library platform
• Why: Multiple clients need professional reporting, efficiency is critical, and client retention depends on insights
• Recommendation: Platform with export/presentation features and white-label options
Solo Freelancers
• Depends on: How often you create ads
• Archives if: Occasional projects, tight budget
• Library if: Regular client work, time efficiency matters, want to offer strategic value
Local Businesses
• Probably fine with: Ad archives
• Upgrade if: Competing heavily in the local market, running continuous campaigns
• Why: Limited competitors to track, budget constraints, simpler needs
Let's compare the actual tools you'll encounter when researching ad intelligence solutions.
Meta Ad Library
• URL: https://www.facebook.com/ads/library
• Coverage: Facebook, Instagram, Messenger, Audience Network
• Best for: Quick Facebook/Instagram competitor checks
• Limitations: Clunky interface, no performance data, single-platform only
• Rating: 3/5 for basic use
Google Ads Transparency Center
• URL: https://adstransparency.google.com/
• Coverage: Google Search, YouTube, Display Network
• Best for: Verifying Google ad spend and advertiser legitimacy
• Limitations: Less comprehensive than Meta, limited historical data
• Rating: 2.5/5 for competitive research
TikTok Ad Library
• URL: https://library.tiktok.com/
• Coverage: TikTok platform only
• Best for: Finding trending TikTok ad formats
• Limitations: Basic search, limited filters, newer platform with less history
• Rating: 2/5 for professional use
Vibemyad
• URL: https://www.vibemyad.com/
• Pricing: ₹999/month ($12) Basic | ₹4,999/month ($60) Pro
• Standout Features:
• AI-powered ad creation (create any design in under 60 seconds)
• Deep analytical features (content buckets, customer journey, ad intent)
• Brand ads comparison tools
• Beautiful, intuitive interface
• Most affordable comprehensive solution
• Best for: Small businesses, solo marketers, agencies on a budget
• Unique Advantage: All-in-one spy + creation platform at an unbeatable price
• Limitations: Newer platform (smaller historical database than established players)
• Rating: 4.5/5 for value and features
AdCreative.ai
• URL: https://www.adcreative.ai/
• Pricing: ~$29-299/month
• Standout Features:
• AI ad generation focus
• Creative scoring
• Text generator
• Best for: Brands prioritizing AI creation over spy intelligence
• Limitations: Less emphasis on competitive analysis, higher price point
• Rating: 4/5 for creation, 3/5 for intelligence
BigSpy
• Pricing: $9-499/month
• Standout Features:
• Massive database (1B+ ads claimed)
• Multi-platform coverage
• Affiliate marketing focus
• Best for: Affiliate marketers, dropshippers
• Limitations: Overwhelming interface, data accuracy questions, no creation tools
• Rating: 3.5/5
AdSpy
• Pricing: $149/month (single plan)
• Standout Features:
• Established player (since 2016)
• Facebook focus
• Good filtering options
• Best for: Established brands with a budget
• Limitations: Expensive, Facebook-centric, dated interface
• Rating: 3.5/5
PowerAdSpy
• Pricing: $49-299/month
• Standout Features:
• Multi-platform support
• Detailed analytics
• Engagement metrics
• Best for: Mid-size businesses
• Limitations: Learning curve, inconsistent data quality
• Rating: 3.5/5
Foreplay
• Pricing: $49-249/month
• Standout Features:
• Great for creative teams
• Beautiful swipe file organization
• Team collaboration features
• Best for: Design-focused teams, agencies
• Limitations: Less analytical depth, more inspiration-focused
• Rating: 4/5 for creative teams
According to Capterra's user reviews, price-to-value ratio is the #1 factor in ad tool satisfaction, followed by ease of use and data accuracy.
Let's talk money. Understanding what is the difference between ad libraries and archives includes understanding the cost implications.
Ad Archives (Meta, Google, TikTok):
• Monetary Cost: $0
• Time Cost: High (2-4 hours per comprehensive competitive analysis)
• Opportunity Cost: Missing insights that could improve campaign ROI
• Hidden Costs:
• Designer/marketer time at $50-150/hour = $100-600 per analysis
• Missed opportunities from incomplete intelligence
• Frustration and inefficiency
Real cost of "free": According to Neil Patel's analysis, if you spend 5 hours per week on manual competitive research at a $75/hour fully-loaded cost, that's $19,500 per year in labour costs for inferior results.
Entry-Level Platforms ($9-49/month)
Best for: Solo marketers, small businesses, testing the waters
Vibemyad Basic - ₹999/month (~$12)
• Multi-platform ad spy
• Basic analytics
• AI ad creation (limited)
• Great value for small businesses
BigSpy Starter - $9/month
• 10 searches per day
• Basic filters
• No creation tools
• Good for very light use
Mid-Tier Platforms ($49-149/month)
Best for: Growing businesses, small agencies, serious marketers
Vibemyad Pro - ₹4,999/month (~$60)
• Unlimited searches
• Advanced analytics (journey mapping, intent detection)
• Full AI creation suite
• Brand comparison tools
• Best value in this tier
Foreplay - $49-99/month
• Creative swipe files
• Team collaboration
• Good organization
• Limited analytics
AdCreative.ai - $29-99/month
• AI ad generation
• Creative scoring
• Text AI
• Less competitive intelligence
Premium Platforms ($149-299+/month)
Best for: Established brands, agencies, heavy users
AdSpy - $149/month
• Deep Facebook data
• Unlimited searches
• Detailed filters
• No tiered pricing
PowerAdSpy - $49-299/month
• Multi-platform
• Advanced analytics
• Engagement tracking
• Higher tiers for more features
Let's calculate the actual return on investment for using a paid ad library platform vs. free archives.
Scenario: Small E-commerce Brand
• Monthly ad spend: $10,000
• Current campaign ROI: 3:1 ($30,000 revenue)
• Using free archives: 5 hours/week research
• Marketer's hourly rate: $50
Without Ad Library Platform:
• Research time cost: 5 hours × 4 weeks × $50 = $1,000/month
• Campaign ROI: 3:1 (baseline)
• Total cost: $1,000 (time only)
With Vibemyad Pro (₹4,999 = ~$60/month):
• Tool cost: $60/month
• Research time reduced to: 1.5 hours/week = $300/month
• Better targeting/creative = improved ROI to 3.5:1 (conservative)
• Additional revenue: $5,000/month
• Total cost: $360/month
Net benefit: $5,000 additional revenue - $360 = $4,640/month profit increase
Even a 10% improvement in campaign performance pays for the tool 15-20x over.
According to WordStream's research, brands using competitive intelligence tools see an average 18% improvement in ad performance in the first quarter of use.
Here's a decision framework to determine whether ad archives or ad libraries make sense for your situation.
Answer these questions honestly:
How often do you research competitor ads?
• Rarely (monthly or less) → Archives might work
• Weekly → Need ad library
• Daily → Definitely need an ad library
What's your monthly ad spend?
• Under $1,000 → Archives okay
• $1,000-$10,000 → Ad library recommended
• Over $10,000 → Ad library essential
How many competitors do you track?
• 1-2 → Archives are manageable
• 3-5 → Ad library recommended
• 6+ → Ad library essential
Do you create ads in-house?
• No (agency handles it) → Archives might suffice
• Yes, occasionally → Ad library helpful
• Yes, frequently → Ad library + creation tools essential
How do you value your time?
• "I have plenty of time" → Archives work
• "Time is somewhat valuable" → Ad library worth it
• "Time is my most precious resource" → Ad library mandatory
What's your marketing sophistication?
• Beginner → Archives for learning
• Intermediate → Ad library accelerates growth
• Advanced → Ad library unlocks strategic advantages
Scoring:
• Mostly left answers → Start with free archives, upgrade when you hit their limits
• Mix of answers → Try a low-cost platform like Vibemyad Basic (₹999/$12) for 1 month
• Mostly right answers → You need a comprehensive ad library platform now
Freelance Designers
• Recommendation: Start with archives + Vibemyad Basic
• Why: Limited budget, occasional needs, but AI creation saves huge time
• Upgrade trigger: When you get 3+ regular ad clients
Marketing Managers
• Recommendation: Ad library platform (Vibemyad Pro or equivalent)
• Why: Regular research needs, need to justify budget with data, time efficiency critical
• ROI justification: Easy, show time savings + improved campaign performance
Agency Teams
• Recommendation: Premium ad library with team features
• Why: Multiple clients need professional outputs, and client retention depends on insights
• Upgrade trigger: Immediately, this is a core business tool
Small Business Owners
• Recommendation: Archives if DIY marketing, Vibemyad Basic if running regular ads
• Why: Budget-conscious but needs results
• Upgrade trigger: When ad spend exceeds $2,000/month
Enterprise Marketers
• Recommendation: Premium platform with API access
• Why: Large budgets, need integration with existing tools, sophisticated analysis
• ROI justification: Fraction of ad spend with proven lift
Now that you understand what is the difference between ad libraries and ad archives, here's your action plan for choosing the right tool.
Step 1: Assess Your Actual Needs (Not Wants)
Be honest about:
• Current research frequency
• Team size and collaboration needs
• Technical sophistication
• Budget reality
• Primary use case (inspiration vs. intelligence vs. creation)
Step 2: Test Free Options First
Before paying for anything:
Spend 2 hours with Meta Ad Library researching your top 3 competitors
Try Google Ads Transparency Center if Google Ads matter
Note your frustrations and limitations
Calculate time spent
Step 3: Try One Affordable Paid Platform
Don't start with the most expensive tool. Try:
• Vibemyad Basic (₹999/$12) for 1 month - best value for testing
• BigSpy ($9) if you're extremely budget-constrained
• Focus on one platform to truly evaluate it
Step 4: Measure Your Trial Period
During your trial, track:
• Time saved per research session
• Quality of insights gained
• Actual usage (did you use it or forget about it?)
• Impact on your campaigns
• Ease of use and learning curve
Step 5: Make the Call
After your trial:
• If you used it 3+ times and saved significant time → Upgrade and commit
• If you barely used it → Stick with free archives for now
• If you loved it but the budget is tight → Justify with a time savings calculation
• If you need more features → Consider Pro tier or alternative platform
When evaluating ad library platforms, watch out for:
❌ No free trial - Legitimate platforms offer trials because they know you'll see value
❌ Confusing pricing - Hidden fees, unclear limits, or bait-and-switch pricing
❌ Outdated interface - Clunky UX suggests neglected product
❌ No customer support - You'll need help; make sure it exists
❌ Unclear data sources - "1 billion ads" means nothing without transparency
❌ No updates - Check blog/changelog; stagnant products fall behind
❌ Lock-in contracts - Avoid annual-only plans until you're certain
Look for:
✅ Transparent pricing - Clear tiers, obvious value differences
✅ Active development - Regular feature updates and improvements
✅ Responsive support - Fast replies, helpful team
✅ Free trial or demo - Shows confidence in product
✅ Clear documentation - Tutorials, guides, use cases
✅ Real user reviews - Check G2, Capterra, Trustpilot
✅ Honest limitations - No tool is perfect; transparency builds trust
Understanding what is the difference between an ad library and an ad archive is comes down to this: archives show you history; libraries give you intelligence.
Ad Archives (Free):
• Basic transparency tools from platforms like Meta and Google
• Perfect for occasional spot-checks and verification
• Limited filtering and zero analytical capabilities
• Time-intensive but budget-friendly
Ad Library Platforms (Paid):
• Comprehensive intelligence tools with advanced analysis
• Essential for regular competitive research and campaign planning
• Save significant time while delivering deeper strategic insights
• Investment pays for itself through improved campaign performance
If you're starting out or have minimal needs:
Use the Meta Ad Library and the Google Ads Transparency Center for free research
Track your time and frustration levels
When you hit their limits, try Vibemyad Basic (₹999/$12 for 1 month)
If you're actively marketing:
Calculate current research time costs
Start a free trial with Vibemyad or another affordable platform
Measure time savings and insight quality
Commit to the tool that delivers clear ROI
If you're serious about competitive intelligence:
You already know you need a paid platform
Choose based on your primary need (creation, analysis, organization)
Vibemyad Pro (₹4,999/$60) offers the best all-in-one value for most teams
Free ad archives are valuable transparency tools, but they're not competitive intelligence platforms. If you research competitors more than once a month, create ads regularly, or manage ad budgets over $1,000/month, investing in an ad library platform isn't optional; it's essential.
The time you save, insights you gain, and campaign improvements you'll see invest a no-brainer. At ₹999-₹4,999 per month, platforms like Vibemyad cost less than a few hours of a marketer's time while delivering exponentially more value.
Ready to move beyond basic archives? Start with a free trial of Vibemyad and experience the difference between seeing what your competitors are doing and truly understanding why it works. Your campaigns (and your sanity) will thank you.
Want to dive deeper into ad intelligence? Check out these related guides:
• What Are the Benefits of Using an Ad Library for Small Businesses?
• What is an Ad Library? A Complete Guide to Ad Intelligence Platforms
Get notified when new insights, case studies, and trends go live — no clutter, just creativity.
Table of Contents

Rahul Mondal
Product, Design and Co-founder, Vibemyad

Ananya Namdev
Content Writer, Vibemyad

Rahul Mondal
Product, Design and Co-founder, Vibemyad